The investigation of a UK competition in Apple and Google’s mobile browsers concluded that mobile duopoly policies “prevent economic growth” and can also last economic growth.

“Mobile browsers apps provide the main gateway for consumers to access the web on their mobile browser and the businesses that are notices in the use of consumers by browser apps,” running a summary of 611-page Final Report of Decision Published on Wednesday.

Most concerns recognized related to “Apple policies that determine how mobile browsers, how can we access the web on devices,” each Press release.

This includes issues such as apple ruling using the webkit’s exceptions to other iOS browsers with its own apple parts. Safari with more or earlier access to primary platform in-browser limits that put limits to the ability of opponent browsers to serve the app users click on a web link; and some architectural architecture issues.

Google Arrival, Investigating Anxiety Investiging Investiging Share Share Between Mounte Views and Apple, Google Paying A Vital Part of Safari and Chrome on iOS.

“We know that Apple and Google have earned an essential income if their key rival browser is used to share financial shareholding of financial shareholding to compete with the financial incentive to compete.

But still not implementing the sight

Despite this revision of negative awareness – and despite the UK competition to hold the Apple and Google’s Gunmark Recommended for the reports recommended for the Power Control Control Control to the kick control.

These are the powers to be locked if an active investigation of two tech giants (Opens in January) Confirmed that they have fallen on the scale of the pefted antitrust powers used by the market authority and authority (CMA) ever A major UK reform in targeting competition law target of digital higants begins In January. So remedies for anti-competition issues recognized remain in the air.

The report advises against testing competition using the standard market investigation market – as saying that there is “a number of important ways in these steps.”

Doubt of the cloud, also turned out to be part of the market investigation, dropped from inquiry in November after several Apple Changes that the regulator is considered as likely to relieve competition concerns.

Report by independent inquiry group, set up with CMA if an Apple’s market investigation is opened in the Apple and Google’s Mobile Back to November 2022followed similar conclusions conclusions Last Fall. But the question group now says it is no longer concerned about some specific issues with the Profect screen it has previously done.

An update says by Apple in December who changes how iOS users can transfer their default browser resolved concerns with that platform. While Google Gives Inquiry Group with “New evidence associated with the use of prompts to encourage users to prepare the chromer on Android” which also resolves its concerns.

At the same time, the inquiry group still took issue with some other screen architecture design choices that they said could be making it harder for users’ saple’s alternative.

Future standards?

The final report suggests a variety of potential remedies (or “appropriate interventions,” as these terms are) for the mobile browser competency, referred to Appendix D.

Suggested remedies include Apple use to allow the use of alternative browser courts and requirements that have opposite browsers for rival claims of chrome, etc.

Furthermore, how Google sends seats browser screens can regulate this method, including the amount of default browser pop-ups.

While not on proposed remedies brought forward as part of this CMA market investigation, they can offer a manufacturer of how the regulator is at the end of Apple’s mobile duopoly.

That’s assuming its digital markets unit’s investigation determines they have so-called strategic market status (SMS), meaning they would fall under the special abuse control regime and could be subject to such bespoke interventions. Apple and Google’s SMS checks are expected to close later this year.

Commenting a statement, Margot Daly, chair of the independent CMA asking group, wrote:

“Analyzing outlined in our report and various interventions considered to discuss market issues we have to open the market in the market of Apple and Google. The wide analysis we have inlook today is to be present in work as it progresses. “

Apple and Google contacted for comment on the final question of inquiry.

Here is Apple’s statement:

“Apple believes in the prosperous and dynamic markets where innovation can be developed. We face the competition of each part and the user’s constant confidence in the user. We have a constant reliance on the user. We are constantly relied on the user. We will continue to participate in participation in Cme to best discuss their concerns. ”