Numbers are important, but timing is even more important. Crocker and Matchroom explored alternatives following his win, including possible unified and voluntary defences. The IBF ruled that the proposed dates were inconsistent with his mandatory obligations and rejected the plans. No Limit formally opposed any exceptions, and the sanctioning body sided with the challenger’s sponsors.

Once that door closes, the consequences are predictable. The injunction was ordered, the purse bid was called, and Crocker’s first line of defense escaped the control of the matchroom. The competition must now take place within 90 days of the hearing, with the date and venue still to be finalized. One option being considered is placement on the March 28 pay-per-view card in Las Vegas, which would reflect No Limit’s partnership with PBC and TGB Promotions.

Crocker captured the IBF title in Belfast last September, defeating Paddy Donovan for the second time in front of his home crowd. Both games were played on familiar ground, with local support and promotional control firmly on his side. When the belt is secured, the run is over.

Winning the championship should expand the options. In Crocker’s case, it narrowed the scope. The belt brings obligation first, leverage second, and once the paperwork starts working, his first defense will reflect who really controls the terms.