Opukai left the controversial stopping plan. In a significant change, the company Monday said It will never try to separate the control of the gain arm from non-profit board currently guarding operations. "We make the decision for nonprofits to keep OpenI control after hearing from Civic leaders and Attorney General in California and California’s Lawyer," Bret Taylor said, Chairman of Openi.

Openi originally argues that the existing structure is not allowed non-profit of "Easy to do more than preventing for profit." It also said that it should be extra money, only one month after securing $ 6.6 billion in new investment. "Sometimes we need to raise more capital than we think," The company wrote in December. "Investors want to turn us back but, in this capital scale, the usual justification and less structural structure."

Openii’s previous plan called for non-Prede to cone full control of for-profits, instead of any amount of stock provided in the organization process.

This is the controversial part of the Openia plan, with many, including former employees, Groups to work and nonprofit and even Elon Muskthat evokes opposition to the proposal. Today, the company says that nonprofit it will continue to control and become a "A lot of PBC shareholders."

"How to keep control of non-profits? How can that purpose be developed?" inquire Jill Horwitza visibing professor of the Law of Northwestern University. "We learned from the Openi Press Plan to teach all the members of the operating entity board. Will that happen forever? Who are they? Is it self-steady? Do investors say in for who are members of the board?"

Put another manner, OpenI did not say the exact structure it intended to carry out. According to Professor Michael DorffExecutive Director of Leatell Socken Insten Ported Law and UCLA policy, the company can adopt a range of options.

"If there is a type of stock, a vote per share, they choose a plank. You can only give non-profrofit most of the parts, and then they can choose most of the chalkboard. So they will be in charge, at least for a while," He said.

"More stable governance arrangements could be done by having dual class shares, where the nonprofit would have a class of stock and they would be the only owners of that class of stock that is either super voting shares, or even better, you can define a class of stock and say it Has the right to elect a majority of the board."

In short, the company did not say how it planned to ensure that the disabling of its control. The non-pharmacy can have a "GREAT" Stake at the start, but there are some different ways that can thaw stake. Even if you separate the idea of ​​an IPO for now, the company can still issue new features or maintain a stock split. In situations, if non-profit of openii is not a special part, the control of the company can be weak.

According to BloombergMicrosoft has not signed up on OpenII suggestion. The company is near $ 14 billion opininai. Under October October Terms of October, there are two years self-changing in a business for profit. If it fails to do so, $ 6.6 billion secured can be debt. We don’t know for sure, but the question of control is probably ahead and center negotiations between Microsoft and Openii, with the company’s future finance. Complex things are that any arrangement two arrives, it should be rubber stamped with State General Lawyers in California and Delaware.

"We look forward to the advancing details of this plan in continuous conversation with (the ags of the state), Microsoft, and newly designated commissioners of non-medicine," Altman wrote his letter.

Parts of the previous Openia plan remained unchanged. As before, the company will also organize for the harvest subsidiary of a Public Belitance Corporation. To do so, openlyiiiiii in Openi to eliminate the current capped prize opukai has not recorded a profit; As last year, the company was recorded around $ 5 billion in loss.

"It is not sold, but a change in structure of something that is simpler," Opui CEO is written Sam Altman in a letter to employees shared by the company. "Instead of our current complex capped-profit structure-which made sense when it looked like there might be one dominant agi effort but doesn’t in a world of many great ages – we are moving to a normal capital structure where everyone has stock."

This article originally appeared to Engadget to https: //www.ii/openais-fevit-pleviters-queves-4946565656565656565656566565656 565656565656565656565656565656565656565656565656565656565656565656565656565656565.html 1.srcd = Rs



Source link